Home Tech Apple Wins Court Ruling Throwing Out $308.5-Million Patent Verdict

Apple Wins Court Ruling Throwing Out $308.5-Million Patent Verdict


Apple persuaded a federal judge to throw out a $308.5 million (roughly Rs. 2,298 crores) jury verdict it lost to a privately-held licensing firm for infringing a patent associated with digital rights management.

In a Thursday night decision, US District Judge Rodney Gilstrap said Personalized Media Communications LLC (PMC) intentionally delayed filing its application with the US Patent and Trademark Office, hoping to obtain a larger payout.

“This court takes very seriously the prospect of disturbing the unanimous verdict of a duly empaneled jury,” but PMC’s “deliberate strategy of delay” was a “conscious and egregious misuse of the statutory patent system,” Gilstrap wrote.

PMC, based in Sugar Land, Texas, claimed in its 2015 lawsuit that the FairPlay software used in Apple’s iTunes service and App Store to decrypt movies, music and apps infringed its patent obtained in 2012.

But the judge, who sits in Marshall, Texas, accepted Apple’s defense of “prosecution laches,” which can block a patent holder from enforcing a patent after an unreasonable and unexplained delay. Gilstrap said PMC’s delay lasted many years.

Jurors had found Cupertino, California-based Apple liable to PMC on March 19, after a one-week trial.

“PMC respectfully disagrees with Judge Gilstrap’s ruling and plans to appeal,” its lawyer Douglas Kline of Goodwin Procter said in an email.

Apple did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

PMC’s patent application dated to applications filed in the 1980s.

Gilstrap said PMC employed a so-called “submarine” patent strategy, filing serial applications and then keeping its patent portfolio “hidden” until industry widely adopted the underlying technology.

He said PMC would demand licensing fees or allege infringement only after it believed infringement was widespread.

He cited an internal PMC document from 1991 identifying Apple, AT&T, Hewlett-Packard, IBM, Intel and Microsoft as “natural candidates” for its strategy.

A June 1 decision by the federal appeals court handling patent cases made it easier to challenge submarine patents.

© Thomson Reuters 2021




Source link

RELATED ARTICLES

iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max, iPhone 13 mini Pre-Orders in India Going Live Today: Price, Offers

iPhone 13, iPhone 13 Pro, iPhone 13 Pro Max, and iPhone 13 mini are set to go on pre-orders in India starting today....

Realme Narzo 50 Series Tipped to Launch in India Next Week, Realme Band 2 May Also Debut

Realme Narzo 50 series is expected to bring the next Narzo-branded smartphones from the Chinese manufacture following the Realme Narzo 30 series. The...

Apple AirPods 3 in Production, Expected to Launch in October: Report

Apple AirPods 3 have entered production and the units have also started to ship from suppliers to Apple, says a new report....

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Unvaccinated Brazil’s Bolsonaro To Defy New York Jab Rule For UN Meet

<!-- -->Brazil's President Jair Bolsonaro has not taken vaccination against COVID-19. (File)Brasilia: Brazil's Covid-unvaccinated President Jair Bolsonaro said Thursday he will attend next...

Paris’ Arc de Triomphe ‘a gift offered to Parisians, French and all art lovers’

The city of Paris is unveiling a monumental artwork built around an actual monument: the Arc de Triomphe completely wrapped in silver and...

“Can Be looked At”: Sunil Gavaskar Names India Player Who Can Be Groomed As Future Captain

Sunil Gavaskar feels KL Rahul can be groomed as the captain in T20Is.© InstagramVirat Kohli's decision to step down as India's T20I captain...

Recent Comments